Complaint ID 113423 — Public Copy

Report generated July 29, 2026 8:49 AM.

On this Page

Status: Approved/Closed

Complaint Received
July 28, 2025 10:30 AM
Assigned Office
Mountain District
Complaint Closed
October 31, 2025 8:56 AM
Review Comments
[Not entered]

Nature of Complaint

Dear Mr. Wells and Mr. Wlochowski, I am filing a formal complaint and submitting an associated Open Records Request concerning what appears to be an unauthorized and unpermitted buffer disturbance along Mountaintown Creek, a Georgia-designated trout stream, on Parcels 3051AB 008 and 009, currently or recently owned by CBD Investments, LLC. I have split this complaint out separately and from 3815 Gallery Court to enable easy tracking in the complaint tracking system. This complaint has not been put into the tracking system as far as I can tell. Thx. ❗ Buffer Violation Details Between approximately July 14 and July 20, 2025, extensive land disturbance was observed on the above parcels, directly across Mountaintown Creek from my residence. The activity included: Total removal of riparian vegetation within 50 feet of the stream, use of heavy equipment, including a forestry mulcher, on steep slopes, construction of access cuts or roads approaching the creek, absence of any BMPs, silt fencing, or erosion control, no posted buffer variance or permit information. This work falls clearly within the state-mandated 50-foot vegetative buffer as required by O.C.G.A. § 12-7-6(b)(15) of the Georgia Erosion and Sedimentation Act and appears to have been conducted without a variance, notice, or mitigation plan. Although I understand that Gilmer County may have issued a Stop Work Order on or about July 21, 2025, by that time, significant clearing had already occurred. I believe this constitutes a failure of enforcement and oversight, especially given the trout stream designation and the environmental sensitivity of the site. 📄 Open Records Request (O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70 et seq.) Pursuant to the Georgia Open Records Act, I request the following from GA EPD: All applications, approvals, denials, or variances related to stream buffer encroachments on parcels 3051AB 008 and 009, from January 1, 2020 to present, all correspondence between GA EPD and Gilmer County concerning these parcels, including any enforcement communications or technical assistance, records identifying the current or past owners, applicants, contractors, or agents involved in any work or permitting on these parcels, any notices of violation, enforcement actions, or approved restoration plans if applicable If no such variance has been issued, please state this explicitly in writing. 📝 Requested Actions I respectfully request the following actions from both the Georgia EPD and Gilmer County: Immediate investigation and site visit to assess the extent of damage and ongoing risk to Mountaintown Creek, issuance of formal enforcement actions if violations are confirmed, public disclosure of any variance or permit approvals, if any exist, implementation of a full stream buffer restoration plan, with native vegetation and ongoing monitoring. This matter is part of a broader concern regarding the enforcement of Georgia's trout stream buffer law in Gilmer County. I am committed to ensuring the law is applied fairly, consistently, and in accordance with established procedures. Please acknowledge receipt of this complaint and open records request. I will also be sending this letter via certified mail to ensure documentation.

Primary Concern
Erosion & Sedimentation Control
Secondary Concern
Water Quality Control

Complaint Location

Location of Complaint
Parcels 3051AB 008 and 009
City of Complaint
Ellijay
County of Complaint
Gilmer County

Source

Source Name
[Not entered]
Facility ID Number
[Not entered]

Source Contact

Contact Name
[Not entered]
Source Address
[Not entered]

Actions

Other

31‑Oct‑2025 by Jonathan Wells

Given the lack of lack of violations, no action from EPD is necessary at this time. This complaint is recommended for closure.

Other

20‑Aug‑2025 by Gibson Hicks

EPD met with complainant, Sherman Hawkins, at his residence to discuss his concerns. EPD walked the Road that is adjacent to the parcels of concern on the other side of the Creek. A steep slope was observed on the opposite side of the Creek. Tree stumps were visible from where trees had been cut selectively on the slope. Mulch was also observed on the ground of the slope leading to the Creek. No Land Disturbing Activity (LDA) was observed at the time of the Site visit, no equipment was observed in the buffer, and there was no evidence of track marks observed; no soil was exposed. Additionally, the cutting of the trees was not associated with an active LDA Permit or NPDES Construction Stormwater Permit. Trees within the buffer may be cut and removed. To remove the trees without triggering the need for an approved buffer variance, the removal must be accomplished within the following guidelines: 1) There shall be no land disturbance involved. 2) Trees must be cut and removed by hand. 3) Tree stumps must remain in place. The removal of the tree stump will constitute a land disturbing activity, and a variance will be required. 4) The activity shall not utilize wheeled or tracked machinery or equipment within the buffer. 5) The activity cannot be associated with a project involving land disturbance that requires coverage under the NPDES construction general permit. (note: tree cutting (leaving stumps no grading) within the buffer could take place prior to the project having permit coverage (local LDA or NPDES) before the NOI or after the NOT) 6) The activity cannot be associated with a project involving land disturbance that requires a local land disturbing activity permit. The landowner must comply with any other applicable local ordinances enforced by the LIA EPD met with the Complainant prior to this Complaint, where EPD visited the site and inspected the site for any violations that were present at that time. At the time of the site visit, no violations were observed.

Other

20‑Aug‑2025 by Gibson Hicks

EPD could not determine with certainty that any violations had occurred at the time of the Site visit. Tree trimming and cutting appeared to have been performed in a manner that is consistent with practices that EPD allows for maintenance of vegetation within the buffer of State waters. Due to a lack of observable violations, this complaint is recommended for closure.

Other

8‑Aug‑2025 by Gibson Hicks

The LIA responded and was already aware of the complaint. The LIA informed EPD that trees had been hand cut, some of which were to the Creek's edge. The LIA does not feel that hand cutting trees and forestry mulching is anything that the LIA can regulate.

Other

8‑Aug‑2025 by Gibson Hicks

EPD contacted the County LIA over this matter and planned to conduct a joint site visit.

Attachments

(Attachments may not be available for complaints resolved before April 2018. Please note that not every complaint has attachments.)

None.